tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5427587583898590293.post4058590678265752435..comments2023-10-31T03:41:34.562-07:00Comments on Brad Buchsbaum's Blog: Voodoo Meta-AnalysisBrad Buchsbaumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10757537675625801119noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5427587583898590293.post-59909952427770958562009-03-08T01:38:00.000-08:002009-03-08T01:38:00.000-08:00Ooh, it's always interesting to know the story beh...Ooh, it's always interesting to know the story behind the paper - that makes sense. Although ScienceDirect is still under the weather so I can't access those papers.Neuroskeptichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06647064768789308157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5427587583898590293.post-59357466227832804402009-03-05T07:11:00.000-08:002009-03-05T07:11:00.000-08:00An interesting summmary - thanks.Are you aware of ...An interesting summmary - thanks.<BR/><BR/>Are you aware of Nancy Kanwisher's previous attack on whole-brain fMRI experiments and Karl Friston's cutting reply [(NeuroImage vol 30, 2006, page 1077 onwards. ScienceDirect is playing up at the moment and won't give me a link.)]<BR/><BR/>Anyway, it suggests that Vul's paper is just a continuation of the battle between whole brain and ROI approaches.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09807522553724731904noreply@blogger.com